I am more of a Diesel-head, rather than a Petrol-head.
I liked the previous gen City, but this new one completely made me hate it.
Too much cost cuttings and flimsy build are the compromises made to deliver a long equipment list here.
For the price of 13 lacs on-road, the quality is cheap. Also the engine noise is unbearable for the price.
Vento is one among my favorites. It is cheaper than the City, also has fantastic quality, even though there isn't much "unnecessary" features as in the City. It is the pure luxury sedan with almost no compromises. The Rapid follows the same traits, at even cheaper price. A.S.S seems to be doubtful though; but when you own a premium quality brand, you ultimately have to pay the premium right?
The Verna looks great, but is too low for my taste and the rear seats are not good for 5'11" tall guys like me. Quality is decent, but it's the driving handling and dynamics that severely let it down. Although the engine is smooth like butter, the handling and suspension too is like butter and slushy! So, I decided never to depend on a Hyundai car; but the Grand i10 and Xcent changed my perception (they are much better).
Now, the new Ciaz; I am yet to see it in the showrooms here, but I can honestly say, it will be a Maruti Suzuki for sure, with better build than Honda's current cars (Amaze, Mobilio) and good VFM. Since Maruti cars like Swift, DZire and Ertiga are known for their ride and handling balance, I guess the Ciaz will be in the same league too. Though I currently drive a DDis Ertiga, I can't comment about the Ciaz, even though it has the same engine, because the tuning has been changed and acceleration timings are much faster (claimed by reviews). But the equipment list seems to be interesting.
I will reserve my vote for later, after a thorough TD of the Ciaz. Also I will post a clear review.
I liked the previous gen City, but this new one completely made me hate it.
Too much cost cuttings and flimsy build are the compromises made to deliver a long equipment list here.
For the price of 13 lacs on-road, the quality is cheap. Also the engine noise is unbearable for the price.
Vento is one among my favorites. It is cheaper than the City, also has fantastic quality, even though there isn't much "unnecessary" features as in the City. It is the pure luxury sedan with almost no compromises. The Rapid follows the same traits, at even cheaper price. A.S.S seems to be doubtful though; but when you own a premium quality brand, you ultimately have to pay the premium right?
The Verna looks great, but is too low for my taste and the rear seats are not good for 5'11" tall guys like me. Quality is decent, but it's the driving handling and dynamics that severely let it down. Although the engine is smooth like butter, the handling and suspension too is like butter and slushy! So, I decided never to depend on a Hyundai car; but the Grand i10 and Xcent changed my perception (they are much better).
Now, the new Ciaz; I am yet to see it in the showrooms here, but I can honestly say, it will be a Maruti Suzuki for sure, with better build than Honda's current cars (Amaze, Mobilio) and good VFM. Since Maruti cars like Swift, DZire and Ertiga are known for their ride and handling balance, I guess the Ciaz will be in the same league too. Though I currently drive a DDis Ertiga, I can't comment about the Ciaz, even though it has the same engine, because the tuning has been changed and acceleration timings are much faster (claimed by reviews). But the equipment list seems to be interesting.
I will reserve my vote for later, after a thorough TD of the Ciaz. Also I will post a clear review.