I just put 3M RE70 for my front and Global Ruby for the sides and back of my i10. I am quite satisfied. V-Kool is way too expensive.
Suncontrol Film - Help
- Thread Starter Interceptor
- Start date
so 3M also have clear sunfilm i thought only v-cool had those .
I have installed VK 70 only on sides of my i10. However I feel its equivalent to garware high end films in reducing heat. Vk70 costed me a bomb at 12900 INR (Only for sides)
3M are also good.Also had looked at llumar air 75 an year ago. Found them good as well.
However when I spoke to garware company guy from Aurangabad (where garware makes these films) he told that they only export films abroad and later they are branded by everybody.
3M are also good.Also had looked at llumar air 75 an year ago. Found them good as well.
However when I spoke to garware company guy from Aurangabad (where garware makes these films) he told that they only export films abroad and later they are branded by everybody.
went i got installed my sunfilm for 3100 every one was shocked . if it was 12k then i am sure every one would had heart attack
Today, I got V Kool installed on my Punto at an Authorised V Kool dealer. The install was perfect in a closed room.
Congrats Raj. Dont forget to update your thread http://www.theautomotiveindia.com/forums/accessories-spare-parts/3087-tints-white-fiat-punto-3m-vs-vkool.html with pics of your tints.
Here are some tints.
Vento - 3M (4 windows and rear window)
Swift - LLumar (Front Windshield)
Inside View
Front Sunfilm Vs Driver window sun film
Vento - 3M (4 windows and rear window)
Swift - LLumar (Front Windshield)
Inside View
Front Sunfilm Vs Driver window sun film
In my opinion any sun film you use should not compromise the visibility levels.Modern a/c technology in cars are advanced enough to cool a car in 2-3 minutes even without sun films on them
I did not have any sun films in my previous car. However this time around i was being forced by my relatives to put a sun film for my car. After much deliberation i decided to go for 3M brand.The next dilemma i had was to choose between the RE 50 and RE 70 series(the legally valid choices). Now RE 50 has 50% visibility,99% UV reduction and 43% solar rejection . RE 70 has 70% visibility,98% UV reduction and 34% solar rejection. The sun film dealer tried telling me that RE 50 would suit my carbon gray color car look wise .Finally went for RE 70 as good visibility was more important to me than good looks
At first glance it appears that i have not put any sun films at all (its so transparent). However its doing the job its intended to do
I did not have any sun films in my previous car. However this time around i was being forced by my relatives to put a sun film for my car. After much deliberation i decided to go for 3M brand.The next dilemma i had was to choose between the RE 50 and RE 70 series(the legally valid choices). Now RE 50 has 50% visibility,99% UV reduction and 43% solar rejection . RE 70 has 70% visibility,98% UV reduction and 34% solar rejection. The sun film dealer tried telling me that RE 50 would suit my carbon gray color car look wise .Finally went for RE 70 as good visibility was more important to me than good looks
At first glance it appears that i have not put any sun films at all (its so transparent). However its doing the job its intended to do
Last edited:
i wonder at 70% visibility which sunfilm offer maximum solar rejection ?
Hey Naveen are those tints on your Vento and Swift legal ones? They seem to be too dark!
I wonder how your friend is driving with such dark tints in the sides , leaving the legal issues apart i feel its very difficult during nights!
I wonder how your friend is driving with such dark tints in the sides , leaving the legal issues apart i feel its very difficult during nights!
@CD - Yes, these are legal ones. Vento tints are of medium darkness and Swift is dark (but from inside it is really visible).
BTW, I installed Front windshield sun films on my Swift. Will update the pics soon.
One more mod tomo.![[:D]](https://www.theautomotiveindia.com/forums/images/smilies/Big%20Smile.gif "Big Smile [:D]")
![[evil]](https://www.theautomotiveindia.com/forums/images/smilies/Evil.gif "Evil [evil]")
BTW, I installed Front windshield sun films on my Swift. Will update the pics soon.
One more mod tomo.
@CD - Yes, these are legal ones. Vento tints are of medium darkness and Swift is dark (but from inside it is really visible).
BTW, I installed Front windshield sun films on my Swift. Will update the pics soon.
One more mod tomo.
BTW, I installed Front windshield sun films on my Swift. Will update the pics soon.
One more mod tomo.
Apart from Delhi i dont think these rules are strictly applied though
![[;)]](https://www.theautomotiveindia.com/forums/images/smilies/Wink.gif "Wink [;)]")
I may be wrong here but as far as i know the legality of sunfilms is based on the visibility from outside and not inside. The idea is that cops should have decent visibility of the person sitting inside the car which is why a visibility level of 50% on the side and 70% on the front/rear is recommended
Apart from Delhi i dont think these rules are strictly applied though
Apart from Delhi i dont think these rules are strictly applied though
![[frustration]](https://www.theautomotiveindia.com/forums/images/smilies/Frustration.gif "Frustration [frustration]")
Here are my tints.
