Thread Starter
#1
A great steps towards the right direction, Read below for complete details:
Two-wheeler manufacturers will now have to sell their vehicles bundled with a helmet as the Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld the Delhi High Court's earlier order. Last year, the Delhi High Court had mandated compulsory purchase of helmet along with new two-wheelers. However, the Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers (SIAM) had filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) in the Supreme Court against the High Court order, arguing that the Motor Vehicles Act already stipulates the use of a helmet while riding a two-wheeler and the order amounts to changing the rule from “a helmet for a person” to “a helmet for a vehicle.”
The Supreme Court bench comprising Mr Justice G.S. Singhvi and Mr Justice A.K. Ganguly, however, said it was inclined to dismiss the SLP, after which the petitioner's lawyers told the court that they preferred to withdraw the plea instead. Industry officials said that the new ruling will be a problem for customers buying their second two-wheeler. Those already owning a helmet will still be forced to buy a new one. Moreover, companies may also have to bear the cost of bundling the helmet with the two-wheeler, because the customer may not be willing to pay that much extra.
PTI adds: SIAM also raised questions over the High Court's direction to provide only those helmets conforming to the Bureau of Indian Standards.
“The High Court made a serious error in directing that all purchasers of two-wheelers have to purchase helmet only from the dealer. “This direction curtails the freedom of the purchaser to purchase helmet from the open market and third parties. (Courtesy: Hindubusinessline)
Drive Safe,
350Z
Two-wheeler manufacturers will now have to sell their vehicles bundled with a helmet as the Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld the Delhi High Court's earlier order. Last year, the Delhi High Court had mandated compulsory purchase of helmet along with new two-wheelers. However, the Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers (SIAM) had filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) in the Supreme Court against the High Court order, arguing that the Motor Vehicles Act already stipulates the use of a helmet while riding a two-wheeler and the order amounts to changing the rule from “a helmet for a person” to “a helmet for a vehicle.”
The Supreme Court bench comprising Mr Justice G.S. Singhvi and Mr Justice A.K. Ganguly, however, said it was inclined to dismiss the SLP, after which the petitioner's lawyers told the court that they preferred to withdraw the plea instead. Industry officials said that the new ruling will be a problem for customers buying their second two-wheeler. Those already owning a helmet will still be forced to buy a new one. Moreover, companies may also have to bear the cost of bundling the helmet with the two-wheeler, because the customer may not be willing to pay that much extra.
PTI adds: SIAM also raised questions over the High Court's direction to provide only those helmets conforming to the Bureau of Indian Standards.
“The High Court made a serious error in directing that all purchasers of two-wheelers have to purchase helmet only from the dealer. “This direction curtails the freedom of the purchaser to purchase helmet from the open market and third parties. (Courtesy: Hindubusinessline)
Drive Safe,
350Z