Thread Starter
#1
With the impeding launch of Hyundai Eon and continued labour problems in Gurgoan is it the end of road for MSIL dominance?
Before I jump into conclusion let us see what went wrong?
1. Products - the products that made Maruti once king have let it down miserably- It has been nearly 28 years - yet MSIL never has launched a product of its own it has just plucked a model from vast stable of its parent company and sold it here - a case being New Swift
2.Not in sync with market dynamics - Gone our days when people buy a car for transportation only - The 1970 - 1980 baby boomers and their young family requirement have changed - want quality interiors , aspirational value , luggage space, equipment and space - which is why a a product like i20 sells as much as 8000 units a month despite underpowered engines and so many problems.
3.Quality interiors - Being king of J D power does not matter if you can't provide quality interiors at a decent price - MSIL stop providing cheap quality
4.Lack of market research and product development -
A case being - Estilo which was branded as Zen so to attract Zen customers towards an old boxy defunct model
A- star - If maruti had launched Japanese A- star( aka Alto ) it would have sold much more.
Alto - despite being 11 year old design MSIL has been in a slumber with no constant development and no replacement in sight - MSIL has lost a golden opportunity here.
Still no diesel in small car segment like Beat Diesel
Unnecessary distraction - Launch of Kizashi , Vitara , - these products should have been launched as separate brand like Acura by Honda and not as Suzuki if it had to been launched plus quality should have been improved.
5.Too many products - MSIL small portfolio is filled with too many products many of them competing with each other - Estilo , Wagon R , A- star are fighting fo same customers rather than their counterparts.same can be said about Ritz and Swift.
6.Not using cash surplus - MSIL has lot of cash surplus which it does not want to use for R&D in India - if a part of it had been used it would benefited the company
7.Indians getting tired of MSIL - 28 years is long time and people are getting tired of MSIL - a case being many people in Swift segment buy other cars not because more VFM than Swift but want to look different from Herd - for this there is no solution here but create a new premium brands and too many options .
Is it the end of road for MSIL dominace - yes and no - yes market share will fall but MSIL will still maintain leadership because the small car segment development costs too much money and rewards are uncertain. and cost of replacing it with new products is all together a new story.Suzuki has always responded well too changing market dynamics whether at the turn of millennium or now and its biggest USP is small car development which even VW lacks - thats why all its new cars are built on old paltforms which are just modified - VW Polo and Fabia being a case in point.
So what are other people views?
Before I jump into conclusion let us see what went wrong?
1. Products - the products that made Maruti once king have let it down miserably- It has been nearly 28 years - yet MSIL never has launched a product of its own it has just plucked a model from vast stable of its parent company and sold it here - a case being New Swift
2.Not in sync with market dynamics - Gone our days when people buy a car for transportation only - The 1970 - 1980 baby boomers and their young family requirement have changed - want quality interiors , aspirational value , luggage space, equipment and space - which is why a a product like i20 sells as much as 8000 units a month despite underpowered engines and so many problems.
3.Quality interiors - Being king of J D power does not matter if you can't provide quality interiors at a decent price - MSIL stop providing cheap quality
4.Lack of market research and product development -
A case being - Estilo which was branded as Zen so to attract Zen customers towards an old boxy defunct model
A- star - If maruti had launched Japanese A- star( aka Alto ) it would have sold much more.
Alto - despite being 11 year old design MSIL has been in a slumber with no constant development and no replacement in sight - MSIL has lost a golden opportunity here.
Still no diesel in small car segment like Beat Diesel
Unnecessary distraction - Launch of Kizashi , Vitara , - these products should have been launched as separate brand like Acura by Honda and not as Suzuki if it had to been launched plus quality should have been improved.
5.Too many products - MSIL small portfolio is filled with too many products many of them competing with each other - Estilo , Wagon R , A- star are fighting fo same customers rather than their counterparts.same can be said about Ritz and Swift.
6.Not using cash surplus - MSIL has lot of cash surplus which it does not want to use for R&D in India - if a part of it had been used it would benefited the company
7.Indians getting tired of MSIL - 28 years is long time and people are getting tired of MSIL - a case being many people in Swift segment buy other cars not because more VFM than Swift but want to look different from Herd - for this there is no solution here but create a new premium brands and too many options .
Is it the end of road for MSIL dominace - yes and no - yes market share will fall but MSIL will still maintain leadership because the small car segment development costs too much money and rewards are uncertain. and cost of replacing it with new products is all together a new story.Suzuki has always responded well too changing market dynamics whether at the turn of millennium or now and its biggest USP is small car development which even VW lacks - thats why all its new cars are built on old paltforms which are just modified - VW Polo and Fabia being a case in point.
So what are other people views?