Maruti Suzuki's Manesar Plant Workers Sabotage Production Cars


Joined
May 23, 2011
Messages
1,043
Likes
23
Location
Pune
I'm so glad that Maruti is on a downhill slide and i hope the company suffers loss of image and business. I will never forget the humiliating experience i went through as a customer at the Khivraj Motors service station in Chennai and i have vowed never to purchase a Maruti product ever again. Damn Maruti and it's associates.
Those are very strong words, monkey1. It is actually disheartening to see MSIL in such a state. It looks like that some external factors are controlling the chaos.

I hope they come out of it soon, otherwise they are bound to see loads of cancellations. They have not been able to catch up with production at all and it seems like they wont in near future.
 
Joined
May 17, 2010
Messages
301
Likes
7
Location
chennai
Those are very strong words, monkey1. It is actually disheartening to see MSIL in such a state. It looks like that some external factors are controlling the chaos.

I hope they come out of it soon, otherwise they are bound to see loads of cancellations. They have not been able to catch up with production at all and it seems like they wont in near future.
I'm not disheartened. I'm waiting for the day that Suzuki folds for good. India is the only country that Suzuki has a market as the rest of the world treats this company with the contempt it deserves. No one's buying their shoddy goods. The SX4 is their only decent product but it was designed by FIAT and see how they have done a poor job of marketing the car. The Kizashi is a waste of time. The time has come to give them the heave-ho outta here.
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2010
Messages
985
Likes
62
Location
Bangalore
Testing times ahead for Maruti Suzuki - 'Maruti workers seize control of Manesar plant wracked by unrest'

MUMBAI: Striking employees of Maruti Suzuki, India's biggest carmaker, have seized control of a factory hit by weeks of labour unrest, the company said on Monday, as a stand-off that has cost the firm over $150 million descended into violence.

Workers attacked managers and supervisors and damaged equipment at the Manesar plant, Maruti said, shutting down production for a third consecutive day as the company battles slowing demand in Asia's third-largest economy.

"The plant is effectively captive in the hands of striking workers who are bent upon violence," the company said in a statement, describing the situation at the factory as "grave."

Maruti has said it would not compromise with the workers who began their initial strike on August 29 after refusing to sign a discipline agreement ordered by the company following accusations of workers deliberately sabotaging car production.

A spokesman for the Maruti Suzuki Employees Union (MSEU), the body co-ordinating the unrest that is not recognised by the company, was not reachable for comment on Monday. But the union has repeatedly denied sabotaging production.

"What we are demanding is that the casual workers should be taken back," MSEU executive member Sushil Kumar said on Saturday, referring to hundreds of part-time workers fired by Maruti during the unrest.

Maruti, 54.2-percent owned by Japan's Suzuki Motor, said 1,500 workers were inside the factory on Monday. The plant produces about 1,000 vehicles a day and the unrest has caused a production loss of 2,600 cars since Friday afternoon.

Supporting strikes by workers at other Suzuki-owned plants in India that supply parts to Maruti's second car factory have resulted in a total loss of production of about $22 million.

Maruti announced an agreement with striking workers last week to end a month-long strike that has already cost the automaker 6.6 billion rupees ($134 million) in lost output and contributed to a 21-percent slump in September sales.

The carmaker's total losses due to labour unrest this year stand at close to $250 million, following a 13-day strike by 800 workers in June at Manesar that crippled production and caused more than $90 million in lost output.

The continued unrest at Manesar comes as Indian carmakers reported a 1.8-percent drop in September sales, as rising interest rates and vehicle costs hurt demand in the world's second-fastest growing major auto market after China.

"The company cannot throw out mobs of people," a Maruti spokesman said. "The action has to come from the police and the authorities."

The strikes at the Manesar plant, which produces the popular Swift and A-Star hatchbacks, have also sparked unrest at Suzuki Powertrain India, which provides engines to Maruti. The unrest had reduced output at the plant to around 65 percent on Monday.

Gunshots were fired by a labour contractor at a Suzuki motorcycle factory after workers there also downed tools to support the Manesar action, a Maruti spokesman said.

Shares in the carmaker closed down 3.8 percent at 1,071 rupees ($21.79) on Monday, against a 2.2-percent rise in Mumbai's benchmark index .

Maruti shares have fallen nearly 24 percent in 2011, underperforming a nearly 20-percent fall in the broader market.

Source: ET
 
Thread Starter #49
Joined
Aug 2, 2011
Messages
2,757
Likes
437
Location
Pune
What exactly is the problem ? There is no such a news anywhere, what is the root cause ? Who is wrong ? Company ? Workers ?
 
Joined
Sep 22, 2011
Messages
146
Likes
58
Location
Delhi
The root cause is difficult to find out in these situations. But in some media reports, there was mention of bad working conditions in the factory. Interestingly, improvement of the working conditions is not the demand agitated workers have declared. In the initial strike, they were demanding recognition for a new workers union and in the present strike, there demand is for reinstatement of suspended/terminated workers. So, there may be some truth (not sure) in the company's argument that this agitation is for some political gains.

Meanwhile, i am concerned about the quality of Maruti vehicles produced during the strike period as these might have been subject of some kind of harm which went unnoticed during quliaty check at the factory.
 
Joined
May 1, 2011
Messages
1,765
Likes
342
Location
delhi
I'm so glad that Maruti is on a downhill slide and i hope the company suffers loss of image and business. I will never forget the humiliating experience i went through as a customer at the Khivraj Motors service station in Chennai and i have vowed never to purchase a Maruti product ever again. Damn Maruti and it's associates.
what happened at the service station dude ?
 
Joined
Oct 21, 2010
Messages
734
Likes
54
Location
Bhopal, India
MARUTI STOPS PRODUCTION OF THE ALTO, SWIFT, DZIRE AND SX4!

Its been almost a week since Maruti workers at the automaker’s Manesar plant went on a flash strike protesting against Maruti’s decision of not engaging contractual workers in gainful employment. Ever since, accusations and counter accusations have flown across both sides even as the Haryana government is stepping in to de-recognize the striking Maruti workers’ unions. Even so, production has been severely affected at Maruti, and that isn’t just at Maruti’s Manesar plant which manufactures the Swift A-Star and the SX4.

Even the Gurgaon plant has lost a chunk of production as workers of Suzuki Powertrain Limited, expressing solidarity with the striking workers of Maruti’s Manesar plant have gone on a flash strike. Due to this, the gearbox and other engine components that Suzuki Powertrain supplies to Maruti’s Gurgaon plant has been badly affected. Maruti Suzuki, like most automakers following Japanese production principles operates on a Just-In-Time(JIT) manufacturing schedule. This means that the automaker, now facing a shortage of parts is not able to build cars at its Gurgaon plant also.

Therefore, the production of Maruti Suzuki’s best selling cars, the Alto and the Dzire, which are both manufactured at the Gurgaon plant has been affected. The Dzire in particular clocked a superb units last month and considering the already long waiting period Dzire Diesels come saddled with, any more delay in production of the Dzire could mean that harried prospective customers look at other options like the Tata Manza and the Toyota Etios. The Alto, for long Maruti’s and India’s largest selling car is also expected to face some heat after the Hyundai Eon has been launched earlier today.

Production of the recently new Swift Hatchback, of which Maruti has received over 1,00,000 bookings so far and the SX4 Sedan, has also been badly affected since the Manesar plant remained shut down for the 6th day. The Indian festive season of Dusshera-Diwali is a time when Indian car industry makes merry due to sales peaking by 20% over other parts of the year. This time around, the festive season might nt bring much cheer to the country’s largest automaker as it has been beset with labour problems for the past few months. The competition meanwhile, will make merry even as Maruti grapples with the workers strike that seems to drag on forever.

As the Maruti workers strike enters the 7th day, Maruti stops production of the Alto, Swift, Dzire and SX4! | IndianCarsBikes.in
 
Thread Starter #53
Joined
Aug 2, 2011
Messages
2,757
Likes
437
Location
Pune
ET Article:

Workers strike thrice in five months, How Maruti Suzuki lost connect with them

There isn't a single burning, insurmountable issue because of which workers at Maruti's Manesar plant have struck work thrice in the last five months . Sruthijith KK & Chanchal Pal Chauhan report from Manesar that at its core lie accumulated grievances and resentment, and events are adding fuel to the fire
A day after workers at Maruti Suzuki's Manesar facility went on strike in June, 55-year-old MM Singh, the company's head of manufacturing, was scheduled to address a meeting of the company's functional heads of departments. "Hum apna connect kahaan kho gaya? Kya gadbad hua? (how did we lose the connect with our workers? what went wrong?)," Singh said in his opening remarks, in part question, part introspection.

Maruti Suzuki has enjoyed relatively good relations with its labour force. The last labour strike was in 2000, at its other facility in Gurgaon. The image of the company in the minds of many management personnel seems to have been that of one where the workers were happy. This could have contributed to negative feedback from workers not trickling all the way up as frequently or forcefully as it should have.

Part of the answers to Singh's introspective question might lie in measures he spearheaded at the company a little over a year ago. In early-2010, coming out of the slowdown in car sales in 2008 and 2009, Maruti experienced a spurt in demand. While the company expected demand to rise, it was not prepared for the sudden jump -- a 30% rise year-on-year -- in bookings.

What made the situation worse was that the company had not invested in manufacturing capacity during the slowdown. The longer wait period for Maruti's models meant rivals started cannibalising market share. "Losing market share due to lack of capacity can prove to be the death knell for an auto company," Singh told Forbes India in an interview published in April this year.

Singh and his team put in place a series of measures to produce more. This included more frequent maintenance of machines, reprogramming robots that control the assembly line to squeeze out efficiency, and implementation of a "flexi-line" that could produce multiple models. Production zoomed.

Singh's measures saved Maruti the cost of a new assembly line -- Rs 1,700 crore. Its Manesar plant, with an installed capacity of 250,000 cars a year then, started making 350,000 cars. To ensure worker buy-in, their incentives were aligned to production.
In essence, Maruti stepped on the gas hard, responding to market realities. But life on the shop floor took a turn for the worse. While production at its Gurgaon facility rose by 17%, Manesar was pushed harder, with a 40% jump.

Young And Local Workforce

The highly automated plant at Manesar was inaugurated in February 2007. Later that year, in December, Shinzo Nakanishi became the managing director of the firm, taking over from Jagdish Khattar, a former bureaucrat who helmed the company for more than eight years. Nakanishi, a nephew of Suzuki Motors chairman Osamu Suzuki, had been non-executive chairman since 2002. But for the first time since 1983, the highest-ranking executive officer at Maruti Suzuki was now Japanese.

According to a company spokesman, the Manesar plant draws its employees mostly from Haryana, in particular from regions such as Jheend and Jhajjar. The plant has about 950 regular workers, 400 trainees, 700 contract workers, and 400 apprentices.

A regular worker at Maruti could make up to Rs 25,000 per month in CTC (cost to company) in his first year of employment (after three years of traineeship). About 50% of this is in the form of performance incentives, including an attendance reward that amounts to 18% of CTC and has become a contentious issue in the ongoing strike. Trainees make Rs 13,000-14,000. And a contract worker, depending on his skills, anywhere from the minimum wage (Rs 4,644 in Haryana) to Rs 12,000.

About 60% of Maruti workers are regular employees and the remaining are contract workers. The minimum qualification to be a regular worker at Maruti is class ten and an Industrial Training Institute diploma. The average age of workers at Manesar is under 25, while that at Gurgaon is above 30. Very few workers at Manesar are married or have children, allowing them greater staying power in a strike.

Most workers at Manesar worked their way through three years of traineeship at Maruti and became regularised in 2010, entitling them to privileges trainees and contract workers don't enjoy. It was a little after that the Singh-helmed acceleration of production seems to have resulted in increased friction in labour relations.

The 7.5-Minute Tea Break

The strategic decision to squeeze out maximum possible efficiency from existing plants didn't trickle down smoothly to the shop floor. Striking workers complain about abusive behaviour and even instances of slapping by supervisors, charges the company denies. Workers say the conditions at the Manesar plant were too stringent, while the management can't seem to comprehend the difficulty as the Gurgaon plant has operated under identical conditions for more than 25 years now.

In an eight-hour work shift, workers get a 30-minute lunch break and two 7.5-minute tea breaks, according to the company spokesman. "You have to remove your safety equipment, run 150 metres to grab your tea and snack, and then run to the toilet that is about 400 metres away, and be back in seven minutes," says Shiv Kumar, general secretary of the proposed Maruti Suzuki Employees Union. "If you are a bit late, abuses from the supervisor. In the morning, the place resembles a busy train station, with everyone grabbing tea and running to the toilet."

Kumar is a brooding, well-built 27-year old, with an intense air about him. He strikes a contrast to the affable and lanky Sonu Gujjar, the president of the proposed union, who has become the charismatic and savvy face of the agitation. Kumar says workers can't leave their workstation even for a minute, supervisors sometimes deny permission for an additional toilet break, and steep salary cuts are effected for even a day of absence from work.

The Maruti spokesman says the 7.5-minute break has been designed in a way that allows workers just enough time to have tea, snack and use the restroom. Tea and snacks are laid out at 80 rest areas adjacent to each work station, across the plant. "I'm not saying you will see anyone strolling about during the tea break, but it is designed to be just sufficient," he says.

In the Gurgaon plant, the rushed break never seems to have been a problem. For more than 20 years, workers from Gurgaon used to be sent to Japan in batches of 60 each month to work in Suzuki's plants for six months. More than 2,000 workers from the Gurgaon plant have worked in Japanese factories fabled for the rigors of operations and processes. This practice was discontinued before the Manesar plant went live, as India had managed to build world-class industrial operations by then.
Check out Brand Equity's Most Trusted Brands List 2011

Another sticky point is the steep cuts in compensation effected for absenteeism. Workers quote different figures -- Rs 1,200-1,500 -- as cuts for a day of leave, authorised or unauthorised. The company spokesman says this impression is due to a misunderstood HR policy designed to encourage 100% attendance. "For an employee whose attendance reward was Rs 2,000 per month, each day of leave in a month reduced attendance reward by Rs 500 (25% of the attendance reward) progressively. At three days of leave in a month, the attendance reward came down to zero," he wrote in an emailed response.

Such cuts were subject to a cap of three leaves in a quarter. This meant if an employee took two days of leave in a month, and didn't take any in the next two, the deducted salary would be refunded at the end of the quarter. The company spokesman admits that the policy and it being part of the performance-linked portion of the compensation was perhaps not adequately explained to shop floor workers
 
Thread Starter #54
Joined
Aug 2, 2011
Messages
2,757
Likes
437
Location
Pune
'Maruti Is Our Company'

Many of these policies are dictated by the demands of the assembly line, where production halts if even a single worker doesn't do his part in the specified time. There is little manoeuvring room, and for this reason, all manufacturing firms place a premium on attendance. But such policies tread a thin line between acceptability and outrage.

"Please understand sir, Maruti is our company. It is our family, it is our organisation," says Shiv Kumar. "We want it to be the number one company always and we have given it our everything. When they have asked for 100,000 cars, we have given them 120,000. But, the management must also understand this: they cannot treat us badly and be vindictive."

It was issues such as these, and the alleged mistreatment, that led the Manesar workers to demand a union to negotiate with the management. According to some accounts, the workers first approached the office bearers of the Maruti Udyog Kamgar Union (MUKU), the Gurgaon-based union recognised by the company as the union for all Maruti workers. The union took a paternalistic view towards their younger colleagues from Manesar. They were told they were young, they were new, and all this was par for the course.

This is where the divergence in accounts begin. Demands for a separate union seem to have started towards end-2010 or early-2011. The company says it has "persuaded" the Manesar workers to be part of the existing union and not form a new one. The workers say the company first promised elections to the existing union in April and officials began warning workers against forming a new union, a charge the company denies. Maruti chairman RC Bhargava was unavailable for an interview last week.

In May, the company announced that elections to MUKU, with a proposed new chapter for Manesar workers, would be held on July 18. (When this election eventually happened, Manesar workers boycotted it, and a panel in the Gurgaon union that was seen as backed by the management was thoroughly beaten by a rival panel.)

Manesar workers first struck work at 4 pm on June 4. Workers say the provocation was that company officials were forcing workers to sign an affidavit stating they were happy to be with the Gurgaon union and don't want a new one. The company spokesman denies this, and says the provocation was that some workers were taking the signatures of others for the purpose of forming a union and supervisors objected to it being done during work hours.

A day before, the workers had filed an application with the Haryana government labour department to form a new union -- titled Maruti Suzuki Employees Union. On June 6, the company summarily dismissed 11 workers for indiscipline and striking work. This included the four office bearers of the proposed union. The strike went on till June 16, when the company agreed to take back the 11 dismissed workers.

At this stage, the workers were being helped by the Gurudas Dasgupta-headed All India Trade Union Congress (AITUC), a leftist trade union. "It is a positive development for the united trade union movement," he told a newspaper reporter the day the first strike ended.

Enter The Trade Unions

The cautious statement masked what the strike represented for AITUC and the trade union movement in general. Nearly 400,000 workers are employed by about 1,000 companies that form the Gurgaon-Manesar-Dharuhera-Rewari auto hub. Trade unions have had a mixed track record here. AITUC and the Hind Mazdoor Sabha (HMS) are the two most prominent trade unions in this belt. The general perception is that AITUC, like other Left-aligned trade unions, has a propensity for violence, while the HMS is more conciliatory.

AITUC leaders claim that HMS colludes with managements, while HMS leaders say violent trade unionism ultimately hurts workers and claim their functioning is more progressive and suited to the needs of the modern worker. It is no secret that most company managements view HMS as the lesser evil.

In the months prior to applying to form a union, Maruti Suzuki's Manesar workers had grown close to AITUC. They frequently sought advice from Suresh Gaur, the union leader at the adjoining Honda Motorcycles plant, who rose to prominence during the violent strikes at that facility in 2005.

That union is affiliated to AITUC, of which, Gaur is a district committee member. AITUC helped the Manesar workers file the application with the Haryana labour department, its leaders met with department officials along with the Maruti workers, and at one point during the strike, Haryana chief minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda met with AITUC's Dasgupta.

But after the first strike ended on June 16, the Manesar workers, according to a AITUC leader, "no longer remained in our grip". A number of trade unions were now "advising" the striking workers. Sonu, Shiv Kumar et al, listened to everyone, but confided in none. This was an astute move.

The union at Suzuki Powertrain India, which is based in the same Manesar campus and shares the assembly line, is affiliated to HMS, as is the union of Suzuki Motorcycles a few kilometres away. Too much proximity towards AITUC would have made it difficult to secure the support of these workers.

Apart from HMS and AITUC, leaders of Central Industrial Trade Union (CITU), New Trade Union Initiative (NTUI), and numerous other trade unions started advising the Manesar group. This included Mazdoor Kranti Parishad general secretary Amitava Bhattacharya, a key figure in the 2007 strike at Kolkata's Hindustan Motors as well as Mamata Banerjee's agitation against the land acquisition for the Tata Nano factory at Singur.

Who had how much influence is hard to ascertain, but everyone agrees that different people enjoyed the confidence of the Maruti workers at different points. Sonu and Shiv Kumar both maintain they have remained independent and plan to do so in the foreseeable future.

After the first strike ended on June 16, Maruti went into damage control mode. It brought in external trainers and the spiritual organisation Brahmakumaris to organise sessions with the workers, where they were encouraged to speak about their problems. "A process of healing had to begin, and it was clear from the amount of feedback we received from that exercise that we had been somewhat cut off from how they were feeling," says a company official.

Tenuous Peace

But the peace didn't last long, and the reasons are contested. Company officials claim that the 11 reinstated workers started flouting all shop floor norms and interfered in the plant's functioning by appointing their own representatives at each bay and asking workers to obey their orders instead of company supervisors and managers. Sonu Gujjar denies this, asking this reporter instead: "Do you think we could do that?"

Shiv Kumar says company officials started victimising workers and threatened false cases against leaders. "Show-cause notices, pay cuts, what have you," he says. According to company sources, through August, workers started adopting a go-slow policy. Production fell from 1,200 cars a day to 700; on two days at the end of August, to 400. On those days, only 95 cars passed the quality check, and the company says workers were sabotaging the cars.
Check out Brand Equity's Most Trusted Brands List 2011

On August 29, the company locked the factory and demanded workers sign a 'good-conduct bond'. The company terminated the services of 18 trainees; and 44 regular workers were either suspended or fired for "sabotaging production and deliberately causing quality problems". The problems included "improper clamping of vehicle doors leading to them falling apart during production, cutting of wiring harness in manufactured cars and dents on the body", the company said in a statement then.

When asked if company had CCTV footage or other evidence of workers indulging in sabotage, the company spokesperson said such evidence has been handed over to the Haryana government. A senior Haryana government official familiar with the negotiations at Maruti said the company has indeed handed over photographs of company officials being manhandled by workers, but had only handed over details of sabotage and not evidence. He wasn't aware if such evidence has been given to other departments or the police.
 
Thread Starter #55
Joined
Aug 2, 2011
Messages
2,757
Likes
437
Location
Pune
Workers say the allegations of sabotage are fabricated to force the good-conduct bond upon them. The bond is essentially a four-sentence statement that reiterates to the worker that the company has the power to dismiss those found indulging in such activities as "go-slow, intermittent stoppage of work, stay-in-strike, work-to-rule, sabotage..." as per the existing provisions governing the factory.

The workers refused to sign. They sat outside the factory and started the second round of protests that would last 33 days. During this period, the company hired contract workers, got its supervisors to work on the shop floor, ushered in the 170 workers who signed the bond, and started production.

The company made about 600 cars a day, about half of regular capacity. By the end of the second strike, it managed to have about 1,000 workers staying in the factory full-time and churn out about 800 cars a day. This gave the management the upper hand, and the striking workers started to tire. Doubts started emerging from their midst if such a long strike was warranted.

Negotiations at this stage were made complex by the varied political influences on workers. "We would make some headway, they would agree, one of them would go to the restroom, make a call, come back and say, 'sorry we didn't agree to anything'. It was going nowhere," a person familiar with negotiations said. Another person who was present at the negotiations representing another side, corroborated this version of events.

By this time, deep resentment had set in, and workers were truly agitated. This meant that the leaders advocating a moderate view came to be favoured less, and those with a more radical approach began to be favoured. But representatives of different trade unions ET spoke with all agreed that ultimately, the Manesar boys took their own decisions and nobody could claim to have had their ears for an extended period.

The two sides reached an agreement on October 1. Workers would sign the good-conduct bond, the 18 trainees would be reinstated, and among the 44 regular workers, those who were dismissed would now only be suspended, and internal investigations would proceed against them.

Plight of Contract Workers

The Haryana government official says they were sometimes frustrated by the management's sudden moves and harsh approach. During the strike in June, while the labour department was negotiating with the workers, the management went ahead and dismissed 11 people. "Sometimes we felt they could be more lenient," he says. .

But the company had been thrown into disarray by the strike. It was losing millions of dollars each day and possibly critical market share at a time when rivals were launching small cars, such as Honda's Brio and Hyundai's Eon. Besides, like Osamu Suzuki reminded everyone in Delhi, it was not in the company's culture to tolerate indiscipline. "Not in Japan, not in India," he said.

When workers came back on October 3, the company took in 170 contract workers and said the remaining would be taken back in phases as the plant scaled up gradually to capacity, according to the spokesman. Workers viewed this as a move to victimise contract workers who had participated in their strike.

They also term this as a violation of the October 1 agreement, even though all agreements have been between the company and regular employees. The workers started demanding that all contract workers and the 44 suspended workers be taken back. If the company can go back on its word, we can renege on our terms as well, they say, even though the company hasn't technically gone back on the agreement.

The plight of the contract workers have been a big factor in the ongoing agitation and the general resurgence of trade union activity in the region. Maruti contracts workers through various labour contractors and pay them as per the skills of the hired workers.

Workers are paid by contractors, not the company; other benefits, such as medical coverage, are also incumbent upon the contractor. This could mean a contract worker doing the same work as a regular employee on a Maruti assembly plant could make a third in compensation and be entitled to no benefits.

The Maruti spokesman says the company ensures contract labourers hired by it are paid at least the minimum wages. But this is done by asking the contractor to furnish proof and that makes it easy for contractors to fudge. They often bill the company more than what they pay the labourer, and pocket the difference, workers say.

This is not a Maruti-specific problem. Many auto companies and component makers function with sometimes as much as 80% of their workforce as contract workers. This means less pay, no benefits, no hassles brought on by the antiquated labour laws, and greater flexibility to adjust production as per demand. This practice has spread in the auto hub and is causing a build-up of resentment, union leaders say.

The workers of Maruti Suzuki's Manesar plant went on strike again on 7 October. This time, they were joined by workers at the adjoining Suzuki Powertrain and Suzuki Motorcycles. The strike at Suzuki Powertrain dealt a bodyblow to Suzuki's operations in India. It makes the company's popular diesel engines and critical components of the petrol engine.

Within days, the disruption in the supply chain started choking production at the Gurgaon plant. Maruti Suzuki had to completely stop production of popular models such as Swift and DZire, just ahead of the Diwali festive season, when car sales soar each year. The gloom has spread to the company's dealer network across the country, where festive shoppers are turning back due to the long and now uncertain wait list.

The management worried for the safety of the factories as workers laid siege to them. Over the weekend, the state administration pressed 4,000 cops into service and kept another 12,000 on backup, as it moved in to shift the workers out of the plant following an order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court.

Although the strike has now been declared illegal by the Haryana government, it has already gone far beyond what anybody expected when workers first laid down tools at Manesar on June 4. For better or for worse, the company that ushered mass car ownership to India will never be the same again.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2009
Messages
1,559
Likes
154
Location
Thodupuzha,Kerala
What exactly is the problem ? There is no such a news anywhere, what is the root cause ? Who is wrong ? Company ? Workers ?
Now that is the right question that people and the media should be asking. But since no one is, I suspect that the chaos is funded and operated by someone else, Probably another manufacturer:suspect:
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2009
Messages
1,559
Likes
154
Location
Thodupuzha,Kerala
Might be , but only workers and managers know exactly what it is!
God, This is going crazy. I went through your posts and reports of what's going on at Maruti. Great detailed report Surfer. I feel so sad that the company is almost dying out here. I too think its never going to be the same ever for Maruti.
 
Joined
Nov 1, 2010
Messages
4,239
Likes
372
Location
Kannur,Kerala
The Maruti spokesman says the 7.5-minute break has been designed in a way that allows workers just enough time to have tea, snack and use the restroom. Tea and snacks are laid out at 80 rest areas adjacent to each work station, across the plant. "I'm not saying you will see anyone strolling about during the tea break, but it is designed to be just sufficient," he says.
I am a QA/Qc by profession and I have visited large scale Indian manufacturer while I used to work in India for surveys and inspections.
and it is very unfortunate to note that most of the manufacturing unit
"work department" are badly treated. they would be working under threat of getting fired or no promotions.
It would be all the time a manager or supervisor behind me buttering and trying to cover my eyes with his sweet polite words and excuses.
When asked about safety issues and hazards they will reply "Sir, are you married? how many kids? your preferred meals?..etc.
they would have all the papers perfect but the physical condition would be vice versa.

I can very much understand how difficult it would be to co-operate with management guys who spit out such absurd criteria "7.5 minute Tea beak" .huh.

if this is the situation the Maruthi deserves the same plight.
 
Joined
Jul 28, 2011
Messages
1,763
Likes
752
Location
Daman
I don't know which period you are talking about. There is tremenous progress in working conditions over the years and now a days big professionally run companies in India treat their work department very well.

While this statement is true about American and European MNCs operating in India and large professionally run Indian companies, its not the same case always with Korean companies. I don't know about Japanese companies.

A dispute on 7.5 min tea break sounds crazy. It could be the result of excessive dependence on Consultants and Industrial Engineering experts for productivity improvement.
 

Top Bottom